The "DOTNET_CLI_TELEMETRY_OPTOUT" environment variable should be defined when using the product, not when installing it (the installation phase is just extract the files anyway).
Also use `~` instead of `-` to check for the variant and fix the second argument for `env.set` which should also be a string.
Add debug log for external detection tests. The debug log
is used to print which test is being executed.
Skip version audit on Windows where appropriate
* Update package.py to osg 1.119 and igtf 1.128
* Remove unnecessary white space
* Add missing comma
* change url to use git and use commit hash from repository instead of ssh256sum of tar.gz
* [@spackbot] updating style on behalf of rahmans1
---------
Co-authored-by: rahmans1 <rahmans1@users.noreply.github.com>
* * Add initial tests-sos package
* Remove failing call of missing setup_compiler_environment from sos
package
* Add several variants for sos package
* [@spackbot] updating style on behalf of jack-morrison
We run `extend spack_flags_list SPACK_LDFLAGS` for `$mode in ld|ccld`.
That's problematic, cause `ccld` needs `-Wl,--flag` whereas `ld` needs
`--flag` directly. Only `-L` and `-l` are common to compiler & linker.
In all build systems `LDFLAGS` is for the compiler not the linker, cause
any linker flag `-x` can be passed as a compiler flag `-Wl,-x`, and there
are many compiler flags that affect the linker invocation, like `-fopenmp`,
`-fuse-ld=`, `-fsanitize=` etc.
So don't pass `LDFLAGS` to the linker directly.
This way users can set `ldflags: -Wl,--allow-shlib-undefined` in compilers.yaml
to work around an issue where the linker tries to resolve the `libcuda.so.1`
stub lib which cannot be located by design in `cuda`.
* Updates for rocm
Updated for rocm@6
Added conflict between rocprofiler and roctracer.
Request either +rocprofiler or +roctracer when +rocm. In this case, it automatically builds for one, instead of displaying the message.
Request +rocm when using either +rocprofiler or +roctracer. In this case, it automatically builds with +rocm, instead of displaying the message.
Disabled the tests. Will update them with the new test method.
* [@spackbot] updating style on behalf of jordialcaraz
---------
Co-authored-by: jordialcaraz <jordialcaraz@users.noreply.github.com>
Some packages can't be redistributed in source or binary form. We need an explicit way to say that in a package.
This adds a `redistribute()` directive so that package authors can write, e.g.:
```python
redistribute(source=False, binary=False)
```
You can also do this conditionally with `when=`, as with other directives, e.g.:
```python
# 12.0 and higher are proprietary
redistribute(source=False, binary=False, when="@12.0:")
# can't redistribute when we depend on some proprietary dependency
redistribute(source=False, binary=False, when="^proprietary-dependency")
```
To prevent Spack from adding either their sources or binaries to public mirrors and build caches. You can still unconditionally add things *if* you run either:
* `spack mirror create --private`
* `spack buildcache push --private`
But the default behavior for build caches is not to include non-redistributable packages in either mirrors or build caches. We have previously done this manually for our public buildcache, but with this we can start maintaining redistributability directly in packages.
Caveats: currently the default for `redistribute()` is `True` for both `source` and `binary`, and you can only set either of them to `False` via this directive.
- [x] add `redistribute()` directive
- [x] add `redistribute_source` and `redistribute_binary` class methods to `PackageBase`
- [x] add `--private` option to `spack mirror`
- [x] add `--private` option to `spack buildcache push`
- [x] test exclusion of packages from source mirror (both as a root and as a dependency)
- [x] test exclusion of packages from binary mirror (both as a root and as a dependency)
