* Added 2 new configure patch files to build WRF 3.9.1.1 and 4.2
with aocc@3.0
* Renamed patch files used for building WRF 3.9.1.1 and 4.2 with
aocc@2.3 (mostly, this also removes -march=native from AOCCOPT
and updates LIBMVEC options for aocc@2.3)
* unit tests: mark slow tests as "maybeslow"
This commit also removes the "network" marker and
marks every "network" test as "maybeslow". Tests
marked as db are maintained, but they're not slow
anymore.
* GA: require style tests to pass before running unit-tests
* GA: make MacOS unit tests fail fast
* GA: move all unit tests into the same workflow, run style tests as a prerequisite
All the unit tests have been moved into the same workflow so that a single
run of the dorny/paths-filter action can be used to ask for coverage based
on the files that have been changed in a PR. The basic idea is that for PRs
that introduce only changes to packages coverage is not necessary, this
resulting in a faster execution of the tests.
Also, for package only PRs slow unit tests are skipped.
Finally, MacOS and linux unit tests are now conditional on style tests passing
meaning that e.g. we won't waste a MacOS worker if we know that the PR has
flake8 issues.
* Addressed review comments
* Skipping slow tests on MacOS for package only recipes
* QA: make tests on changes correct before merging
In most cases, we want condition_holds(ID) to imply any imposed
constraints associated with the ID. However, the dependency relationship
in Spack is special because it's "extra" conditional -- a dependency
*condition* may hold, but we have decided that externals will not have
dependencies, so we need a way to avoid having imposed constraints appear
for nodes that don't exist.
This introduces a new rule that says that constraints are imposed
*unless* we define `do_not_impose(ID)`. This allows rules like
dependencies, which rely on more than just spec conditions, to cancel
imposed constraints.
We add one special case for this: dependencies of externals.
We only consider test dependencies some of the time. Some packages are
*only* test dependencies. Spack's algorithm was previously generating
dependency conditions that could hold, *even* if there was no potential
dependency type.
- [x] change asp.py so that this can't happen -- we now only generate
dependency types for possible dependencies.
This builds on #20638 by unifying all the places in the concretizer where
things are conditional on specs. Previously, we duplicated a common spec
conditional pattern for dependencies, virtual providers, conflicts, and
externals. That was introduced in #20423 and refined in #20507, and
roughly looked as follows.
Given some directives in a package like:
```python
depends_on("foo@1.0+bar", when="@2.0+variant")
provides("mpi@2:", when="@1.9:")
```
We handled the `@2.0+variant` and `@1.9:` parts by generating generated
`dependency_condition()`, `required_dependency_condition()`, and
`imposed_dependency_condition()` facts to trigger rules like this:
```prolog
dependency_conditions_hold(ID, Parent, Dependency) :-
attr(Name, Arg1) : required_dependency_condition(ID, Name, Arg1);
attr(Name, Arg1, Arg2) : required_dependency_condition(ID, Name, Arg1, Arg2);
attr(Name, Arg1, Arg2, Arg3) : required_dependency_condition(ID, Name, Arg1, Arg2, Arg3);
dependency_condition(ID, Parent, Dependency);
node(Parent).
```
And we handled `foo@1.0+bar` and `mpi@2:` parts ("imposed constraints")
like this:
```prolog
attr(Name, Arg1, Arg2) :-
dependency_conditions_hold(ID, Package, Dependency),
imposed_dependency_condition(ID, Name, Arg1, Arg2).
attr(Name, Arg1, Arg2, Arg3) :-
dependency_conditions_hold(ID, Package, Dependency),
imposed_dependency_condition(ID, Name, Arg1, Arg2, Arg3).
```
These rules were repeated with different input predicates for
requirements (e.g., `required_dependency_condition`) and imposed
constraints (e.g., `imposed_dependency_condition`) throughout
`concretize.lp`. In #20638 it got to be a bit confusing, because we used
the same `dependency_condition_holds` predicate to impose constraints on
conditional dependencies and virtual providers. So, even though the
pattern was repeated, some of the conditional rules were conjoined in a
weird way.
Instead of repeating this pattern everywhere, we now have *one* set of
consolidated rules for conditions:
```prolog
condition_holds(ID) :-
condition(ID);
attr(Name, A1) : condition_requirement(ID, Name, A1);
attr(Name, A1, A2) : condition_requirement(ID, Name, A1, A2);
attr(Name, A1, A2, A3) : condition_requirement(ID, Name, A1, A2, A3).
attr(Name, A1) :- condition_holds(ID), imposed_constraint(ID, Name, A1).
attr(Name, A1, A2) :- condition_holds(ID), imposed_constraint(ID, Name, A1, A2).
attr(Name, A1, A2, A3) :- condition_holds(ID), imposed_constraint(ID, Name, A1, A2, A3).
```
this allows us to use `condition(ID)` and `condition_holds(ID)` to
encapsulate the conditional logic on specs in all the scenarios where we
need it. Instead of defining predicates for the requirements and imposed
constraints, we generate the condition inputs with generic facts, and
define predicates to associate the condition ID with a particular
scenario. So, now, the generated facts for a condition look like this:
```prolog
condition(121).
condition_requirement(121,"node","cairo").
condition_requirement(121,"variant_value","cairo","fc","True").
imposed_constraint(121,"version_satisfies","fontconfig","2.10.91:").
dependency_condition(121,"cairo","fontconfig").
dependency_type(121,"build").
dependency_type(121,"link").
```
The requirements and imposed constraints are generic, and we associate
them with their meaning via the id. Here, `dependency_condition(121,
"cairo", "fontconfig")` tells us that condition 121 has to do with the
dependency of `cairo` on `fontconfig`, and the conditional dependency
rules just become:
```prolog
dependency_holds(Package, Dependency, Type) :-
dependency_condition(ID, Package, Dependency),
dependency_type(ID, Type),
condition_holds(ID).
```
Dependencies, virtuals, conflicts, and externals all now use similar
patterns, and the logic for generating condition facts is common to all
of them on the python side, as well. The more specific routines like
`package_dependencies_rules` just call `self.condition(...)` to get an id
and generate requirements and imposed constraints, then they generate
their extra facts with the returned id, like this:
```python
def package_dependencies_rules(self, pkg, tests):
"""Translate 'depends_on' directives into ASP logic."""
for _, conditions in sorted(pkg.dependencies.items()):
for cond, dep in sorted(conditions.items()):
condition_id = self.condition(cond, dep.spec, pkg.name) # create a condition and get its id
self.gen.fact(fn.dependency_condition( # associate specifics about the dependency w/the id
condition_id, pkg.name, dep.spec.name
))
# etc.
```
- [x] unify generation and logic for conditions
- [x] use unified logic for dependencies
- [x] use unified logic for virtuals
- [x] use unified logic for conflicts
- [x] use unified logic for externals
LocalWords: concretizer mpi attr Arg concretize lp cairo fc fontconfig
LocalWords: virtuals def pkg cond dep fn refactor github py
* Rewrite relative dev_spec paths internally to absolute paths in case of relocation of the environment file
* Test relative paths for dev_path in environments
* Add a --keep-relative flag to spack env create
This ensures that relative paths of develop paths are not expanded to
absolute paths when initializing the environment in a different location
from the spack.yaml init file.
Currently, regardless of a spec being concrete or not, we validate its variants in `spec_clauses` (part of `SpackSolverSetup`).
This PR skips the check if the spec is concrete.
The reason we want to do this is so that the solver setup class (really, `spec_clauses`) can be used for cases when we just want the logic statements / facts (is that what they are called?) and we don't need to re-validate an already concrete spec. We can't change existing concrete specs, and we have to be able to handle them *even if they violate constraints in the current spack*. This happens in practice if we are doing the validation for a spec produced by a different spack install.
Signed-off-by: vsoch <vsoch@users.noreply.github.com>
As of OpenBLAS 0.3.13, leaving off `TARGET` by default optimizes most
code for the host system -- adding flags that cause the resulting
library to fail (SIGILL) on older systems. This change should ensure
that a "x86_64" target for example will work across deployment systems.
https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/3139
This pull request will add the ability for a user to add a configuration argument on the fly, on the command line, e.g.,:
```bash
$ spack -c config:install_tree:root:/path/to/config.yaml -c packages:all:compiler:[gcc] list --help
```
The above command doesn't do anything (I'm just getting help for list) but you can imagine having another root of packages, and updating it on the fly for a command (something I'd like to do in the near future!)
I've moved the logic for config_add that used to be in spack/cmd/config.py into spack/config.py proper, and now both the main.py (where spack commands live) and spack/cmd/config.py use these functions. I only needed spack config add, so I didn't move the others. We can move the others if there are also needed in multiple places.
