* new package: alphafold
and related dependencies, depends on #27138
* [@spackbot] updating style on behalf of aweits
* fix
Co-authored-by: aweits <aweits@users.noreply.github.com>
On some systems the shell in login mode wipes important parts of the
environment, such as PATH. This causes the build to fail since it can't
find `spack`.
For better robustness, don't use a login shell.
In a full CI job the final spack install is run in an environment formed by scripts running in this order:
export AWS_SECRET=... # 1. Load environment from GitLab project variables
source spack/share/spack/setup-env.sh # 2. Load Spack into the environment (PATH)
spack env activate -V concrete_env # 3. Activate the concrete environment
source /etc/profile # 4. Bash login shell (from -l)
spack install ...
Whereas when a user launches their own container with (docker|podman) run -it, they end up running spack install in an environment formed in this order:
source /etc/bash.bashrc # (not 4). Bash interactive shell (default with TTY)
export AWS_SECRET=... #~1. Manually load environment from GitLab project variables
source spack/share/spack/setup-env.sh # 2. Load Spack into the environment (PATH)
spack env activate -V concrete_env # 3. Activate the concrete environment
spack install ...
The big problem being that (4) has a completely different position and content (on Leap 15 and possibly other containers).
So in context, this PR removes (4) from the CI job case, leaving us with the simpler:
export AWS_SECRET=... # 1. Load environment from GitLab project variables
source spack/share/spack/setup-env.sh # 2. Load Spack into the environment (PATH)
spack env activate -V concrete_env # 3. Activate the concrete environment
spack install ...
* database: don't sort on return from query_local
* ASP-based solver: don't build the hash-lookup dictionary twice
Building this dictionary twice and traversing all the specs
might be time-consuming for large buildcaches.
This test relied on an old version of the `flake8_package` fixture that modified
the spack repository, but it doesn't do that anymore. There are other tests for
`changed_files()` that do a better job of mocking up a git repository with
changes, so we can just delete this one.
A GitHub rebase merge seems to rewrite commits even if it would be a
fast-forward, which means that the commit merged from #24718 is wrong.
- [x] update `.git-blame-ignore-revs` with real commit from `develop`
