* tinygltf: new versions and release branch
for each minor release available, the newest patch release has been added
---------
Co-authored-by: aumuell <aumuell@users.noreply.github.com>
- drop use_xcode = True, as this would lead to an attempt install Xcode (#34064)
- don't automatically build Qt Location with +opengl, as this is
still broken
This built sucessfully with qt@5.15.10+opengl+dbus+phonon on ventura/arm without
Xcode installed (only command line tools) - I did not check with Xcode installed.
The user store is lazily evaluated. The change
in #38975 made it such that the first evaluation
was happening in the middle of swapping to user
configuration.
Ensure we construct the user store before that.
Use curly braces instead of quotes to enclose value or text in Tcl
modulefile. Within curly braces Tcl special characters like [, ] or $
are treated verbatim whereas they are evaluated within quotes.
Curly braces is Tcl recommended way to enclose verbatim content [1].
Note: if curly braces charaters are used within content, they must be
balanced. This point has been checked against current repository and no
unbalanced curly braces has been spotted.
Fixes#24243
[1] https://wiki.tcl-lang.org/page/Tcl+Minimal+Escaping+Style
* Fetching patches wouldn't result in acquiring a stage lock during install
* The installer would acquire a stage lock *after* fetching instead of
before, leading to races
* The name of the stage for patches was random, so on build failure
(where stage dirs are not removed), these directories would continue
to exist after a second successful install.
* There was this redundant "composite fetch" object -- there's already
a composite stage. Remove this.
* For some reason we do *double* shasum validation of patches, before
and after compression -- that's just too much? I removed it.
Spack heuristically adds `<install prefix>/lib` and `<install prefix>/lib64` as rpath entries, as it doesn't know what the install dir is going to be ahead of the build. This PR cleans up non-existing, absolute paths[^1], which
1. avoids redundant stat calls at runtime
2. drops redundant rpaths in `patchelf`, making it relocatable -- you don't need patchelf recursively then.
[^1]: It also removes relative paths not starting with `$` (so, `$ORIGIN/../lib` is retained -- we _could_ interpolate `$ORIGIN`, but that's hard to get right when symlinks have to be taken into account). Relative paths _are_ supported in glibc, but are relative to _the current working directory_, which is madness, and it would be better to drop those paths.
A LazyReference object is a reference to an attribute of a
lazily evaluated singleton. Its only purpose is to let developers
use shorter names to refer to such attribute.
This class does more harm than good, as it obfuscates the fact
that we are using the attribute of a global object. Also, it can easily
go out of sync with the singleton it refers to if, for instance, the
singleton is updated but the references are not.
This commit removes the LazyReference class entirely, and access
the attributes explicitly passing through the global value to which
they are attached.
Without the package name being present in the conflict messages, it is
significantly more difficult to debug concretization failures in
environments that contain many packages.
mesa-glu still has a couple instances of the register keyword which
causes build failures with clang on my platform. This patch removes the
register keyword which doesn't have any impact on correctness.
gperf still uses the register keyword in one place which makes
compilation fail with c++17. This patch adds in a patch file to remove
the usage of the reigster keyword so that it compiles properly.
In late 2021 elfutils was patched to make it build with clang, and these
patches ended up in version 0.186. This commit updates the conflicts to
specify this so elfutils can be built with clang.
These tests now work without any changes to core. Furthermore, it is
surprising that they had to be disabled (at least, as long as the
installer.py tests are run on Windows: these tests are more-basic
and their functionality would have been exercised automatically).
