error messages: condition chaining (#40173)
Create chains of causation for error messages. The current implementation is only completed for some of the many errors presented by the concretizer. The rest will need to be filled out over time, but this demonstrates the capability. The basic idea is to associate conditions in the solver with one another in causal relationships, and to associate errors with the proximate causes of their facts in the condition graph. Then we can construct causal trees to explain errors, which will hopefully present users with useful information to avoid the error or report issues. Technically, this is implemented as a secondary solve. The concretizer computes the optimal model, and if the optimal model contains an error, then a secondary solve computes causation information about the error(s) in the concretizer output. Examples: $ spack solve hdf5 ^cmake@3.0.1 ==> Error: concretization failed for the following reasons: 1. Cannot satisfy 'cmake@3.0.1' 2. Cannot satisfy 'cmake@3.0.1' required because hdf5 ^cmake@3.0.1 requested from CLI 3. Cannot satisfy 'cmake@3.18:' and 'cmake@3.0.1 required because hdf5 ^cmake@3.0.1 requested from CLI required because hdf5 depends on cmake@3.18: when @1.13: required because hdf5 ^cmake@3.0.1 requested from CLI 4. Cannot satisfy 'cmake@3.12:' and 'cmake@3.0.1 required because hdf5 depends on cmake@3.12: required because hdf5 ^cmake@3.0.1 requested from CLI required because hdf5 ^cmake@3.0.1 requested from CLI $ spack spec cmake ^curl~ldap # <-- with curl configured non-buildable and an external with `+ldap` ==> Error: concretization failed for the following reasons: 1. Attempted to use external for 'curl' which does not satisfy any configured external spec 2. Attempted to build package curl which is not buildable and does not have a satisfying external attr('variant_value', 'curl', 'ldap', 'True') is an external constraint for curl which was not satisfied 3. Attempted to build package curl which is not buildable and does not have a satisfying external attr('variant_value', 'curl', 'gssapi', 'True') is an external constraint for curl which was not satisfied 4. Attempted to build package curl which is not buildable and does not have a satisfying external 'curl+ldap' is an external constraint for curl which was not satisfied 'curl~ldap' required required because cmake ^curl~ldap requested from CLI $ spack solve yambo+mpi ^hdf5~mpi ==> Error: concretization failed for the following reasons: 1. 'hdf5' required multiple values for single-valued variant 'mpi' 2. 'hdf5' required multiple values for single-valued variant 'mpi' Requested '~mpi' and '+mpi' required because yambo depends on hdf5+mpi when +mpi required because yambo+mpi ^hdf5~mpi requested from CLI required because yambo+mpi ^hdf5~mpi requested from CLI 3. 'hdf5' required multiple values for single-valued variant 'mpi' Requested '~mpi' and '+mpi' required because netcdf-c depends on hdf5+mpi when +mpi required because netcdf-fortran depends on netcdf-c required because yambo depends on netcdf-fortran required because yambo+mpi ^hdf5~mpi requested from CLI required because netcdf-fortran depends on netcdf-c@4.7.4: when @4.5.3: required because yambo depends on netcdf-fortran required because yambo+mpi ^hdf5~mpi requested from CLI required because yambo depends on netcdf-c required because yambo+mpi ^hdf5~mpi requested from CLI required because yambo depends on netcdf-c+mpi when +mpi required because yambo+mpi ^hdf5~mpi requested from CLI required because yambo+mpi ^hdf5~mpi requested from CLI Future work: In addition to fleshing out the causes of other errors, I would like to find a way to associate different components of the error messages with different causes. In this example it's pretty easy to infer which part is which, but I'm not confident that will always be the case. See the previous PR #34500 for discussion of how the condition chains are incomplete. In the future, we may need custom logic for individual attributes to associate some important choice rules with conditions such that clingo choices or other derivations can be part of the explanation. --------- Co-authored-by: Massimiliano Culpo <massimiliano.culpo@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d3d82e8d6b
commit
b5538960c3
6 changed files with 592 additions and 113 deletions
|
@ -8,11 +8,12 @@
|
||||||
import enum
|
import enum
|
||||||
import itertools
|
import itertools
|
||||||
import os
|
import os
|
||||||
|
import pathlib
|
||||||
import pprint
|
import pprint
|
||||||
import re
|
import re
|
||||||
import types
|
import types
|
||||||
import warnings
|
import warnings
|
||||||
from typing import Dict, List, NamedTuple, Optional, Sequence, Tuple, Union
|
from typing import Callable, Dict, List, NamedTuple, Optional, Sequence, Set, Tuple, Union
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
import archspec.cpu
|
import archspec.cpu
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -337,6 +338,13 @@ def __getattr__(self, name):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
fn = AspFunctionBuilder()
|
fn = AspFunctionBuilder()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TransformFunction = Callable[[spack.spec.Spec, List[AspFunction]], List[AspFunction]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def remove_node(spec: spack.spec.Spec, facts: List[AspFunction]) -> List[AspFunction]:
|
||||||
|
"""Transformation that removes all "node" and "virtual_node" from the input list of facts."""
|
||||||
|
return list(filter(lambda x: x.args[0] not in ("node", "virtual_node"), facts))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _create_counter(specs, tests):
|
def _create_counter(specs, tests):
|
||||||
strategy = spack.config.CONFIG.get("concretizer:duplicates:strategy", "none")
|
strategy = spack.config.CONFIG.get("concretizer:duplicates:strategy", "none")
|
||||||
|
@ -684,7 +692,7 @@ def extract_args(model, predicate_name):
|
||||||
class ErrorHandler:
|
class ErrorHandler:
|
||||||
def __init__(self, model):
|
def __init__(self, model):
|
||||||
self.model = model
|
self.model = model
|
||||||
self.error_args = extract_args(model, "error")
|
self.full_model = None
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def multiple_values_error(self, attribute, pkg):
|
def multiple_values_error(self, attribute, pkg):
|
||||||
return f'Cannot select a single "{attribute}" for package "{pkg}"'
|
return f'Cannot select a single "{attribute}" for package "{pkg}"'
|
||||||
|
@ -692,6 +700,48 @@ def multiple_values_error(self, attribute, pkg):
|
||||||
def no_value_error(self, attribute, pkg):
|
def no_value_error(self, attribute, pkg):
|
||||||
return f'Cannot select a single "{attribute}" for package "{pkg}"'
|
return f'Cannot select a single "{attribute}" for package "{pkg}"'
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def _get_cause_tree(
|
||||||
|
self,
|
||||||
|
cause: Tuple[str, str],
|
||||||
|
conditions: Dict[str, str],
|
||||||
|
condition_causes: List[Tuple[Tuple[str, str], Tuple[str, str]]],
|
||||||
|
seen: Set,
|
||||||
|
indent: str = " ",
|
||||||
|
) -> List[str]:
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
Implementation of recursion for self.get_cause_tree. Much of this operates on tuples
|
||||||
|
(condition_id, set_id) in which the latter idea means that the condition represented by
|
||||||
|
the former held in the condition set represented by the latter.
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
seen = set(seen) | set(cause)
|
||||||
|
parents = [c for e, c in condition_causes if e == cause and c not in seen]
|
||||||
|
local = "required because %s " % conditions[cause[0]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return [indent + local] + [
|
||||||
|
c
|
||||||
|
for parent in parents
|
||||||
|
for c in self._get_cause_tree(
|
||||||
|
parent, conditions, condition_causes, seen, indent=indent + " "
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def get_cause_tree(self, cause: Tuple[str, str]) -> List[str]:
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
Get the cause tree associated with the given cause.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Arguments:
|
||||||
|
cause: The root cause of the tree (final condition)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Returns:
|
||||||
|
A list of strings describing the causes, formatted to display tree structure.
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
conditions: Dict[str, str] = dict(extract_args(self.full_model, "condition_reason"))
|
||||||
|
condition_causes: List[Tuple[Tuple[str, str], Tuple[str, str]]] = list(
|
||||||
|
((Effect, EID), (Cause, CID))
|
||||||
|
for Effect, EID, Cause, CID in extract_args(self.full_model, "condition_cause")
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
return self._get_cause_tree(cause, conditions, condition_causes, set())
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def handle_error(self, msg, *args):
|
def handle_error(self, msg, *args):
|
||||||
"""Handle an error state derived by the solver."""
|
"""Handle an error state derived by the solver."""
|
||||||
if msg == "multiple_values_error":
|
if msg == "multiple_values_error":
|
||||||
|
@ -700,14 +750,31 @@ def handle_error(self, msg, *args):
|
||||||
if msg == "no_value_error":
|
if msg == "no_value_error":
|
||||||
return self.no_value_error(*args)
|
return self.no_value_error(*args)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
try:
|
||||||
|
idx = args.index("startcauses")
|
||||||
|
except ValueError:
|
||||||
|
msg_args = args
|
||||||
|
causes = []
|
||||||
|
else:
|
||||||
|
msg_args = args[:idx]
|
||||||
|
cause_args = args[idx + 1 :]
|
||||||
|
cause_args_conditions = cause_args[::2]
|
||||||
|
cause_args_ids = cause_args[1::2]
|
||||||
|
causes = list(zip(cause_args_conditions, cause_args_ids))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
msg = msg.format(*msg_args)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# For variant formatting, we sometimes have to construct specs
|
# For variant formatting, we sometimes have to construct specs
|
||||||
# to format values properly. Find/replace all occurances of
|
# to format values properly. Find/replace all occurances of
|
||||||
# Spec(...) with the string representation of the spec mentioned
|
# Spec(...) with the string representation of the spec mentioned
|
||||||
msg = msg.format(*args)
|
|
||||||
specs_to_construct = re.findall(r"Spec\(([^)]*)\)", msg)
|
specs_to_construct = re.findall(r"Spec\(([^)]*)\)", msg)
|
||||||
for spec_str in specs_to_construct:
|
for spec_str in specs_to_construct:
|
||||||
msg = msg.replace("Spec(%s)" % spec_str, str(spack.spec.Spec(spec_str)))
|
msg = msg.replace("Spec(%s)" % spec_str, str(spack.spec.Spec(spec_str)))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
for cause in set(causes):
|
||||||
|
for c in self.get_cause_tree(cause):
|
||||||
|
msg += f"\n{c}"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return msg
|
return msg
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def message(self, errors) -> str:
|
def message(self, errors) -> str:
|
||||||
|
@ -719,11 +786,31 @@ def message(self, errors) -> str:
|
||||||
return "\n".join([header] + messages)
|
return "\n".join([header] + messages)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def raise_if_errors(self):
|
def raise_if_errors(self):
|
||||||
if not self.error_args:
|
initial_error_args = extract_args(self.model, "error")
|
||||||
|
if not initial_error_args:
|
||||||
return
|
return
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
error_causation = clingo.Control()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
parent_dir = pathlib.Path(__file__).parent
|
||||||
|
errors_lp = parent_dir / "error_messages.lp"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def on_model(model):
|
||||||
|
self.full_model = model.symbols(shown=True, terms=True)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
with error_causation.backend() as backend:
|
||||||
|
for atom in self.model:
|
||||||
|
atom_id = backend.add_atom(atom)
|
||||||
|
backend.add_rule([atom_id], [], choice=False)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
error_causation.load(str(errors_lp))
|
||||||
|
error_causation.ground([("base", []), ("error_messages", [])])
|
||||||
|
_ = error_causation.solve(on_model=on_model)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# No choices so there will be only one model
|
||||||
|
error_args = extract_args(self.full_model, "error")
|
||||||
errors = sorted(
|
errors = sorted(
|
||||||
[(int(priority), msg, args) for priority, msg, *args in self.error_args], reverse=True
|
[(int(priority), msg, args) for priority, msg, *args in error_args], reverse=True
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
msg = self.message(errors)
|
msg = self.message(errors)
|
||||||
raise UnsatisfiableSpecError(msg)
|
raise UnsatisfiableSpecError(msg)
|
||||||
|
@ -924,7 +1011,7 @@ def on_model(model):
|
||||||
if sym.name not in ("attr", "error", "opt_criterion"):
|
if sym.name not in ("attr", "error", "opt_criterion"):
|
||||||
tty.debug(
|
tty.debug(
|
||||||
"UNKNOWN SYMBOL: %s(%s)"
|
"UNKNOWN SYMBOL: %s(%s)"
|
||||||
% (sym.name, ", ".join(intermediate_repr(sym.arguments)))
|
% (sym.name, ", ".join([str(s) for s in intermediate_repr(sym.arguments)]))
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
elif cores:
|
elif cores:
|
||||||
|
@ -1116,7 +1203,7 @@ def conflict_rules(self, pkg):
|
||||||
default_msg = "{0}: '{1}' conflicts with '{2}'"
|
default_msg = "{0}: '{1}' conflicts with '{2}'"
|
||||||
no_constraint_msg = "{0}: conflicts with '{1}'"
|
no_constraint_msg = "{0}: conflicts with '{1}'"
|
||||||
for trigger, constraints in pkg.conflicts.items():
|
for trigger, constraints in pkg.conflicts.items():
|
||||||
trigger_msg = "conflict trigger %s" % str(trigger)
|
trigger_msg = f"conflict is triggered when {str(trigger)}"
|
||||||
trigger_spec = spack.spec.Spec(trigger)
|
trigger_spec = spack.spec.Spec(trigger)
|
||||||
trigger_id = self.condition(
|
trigger_id = self.condition(
|
||||||
trigger_spec, name=trigger_spec.name or pkg.name, msg=trigger_msg
|
trigger_spec, name=trigger_spec.name or pkg.name, msg=trigger_msg
|
||||||
|
@ -1128,7 +1215,11 @@ def conflict_rules(self, pkg):
|
||||||
conflict_msg = no_constraint_msg.format(pkg.name, trigger)
|
conflict_msg = no_constraint_msg.format(pkg.name, trigger)
|
||||||
else:
|
else:
|
||||||
conflict_msg = default_msg.format(pkg.name, trigger, constraint)
|
conflict_msg = default_msg.format(pkg.name, trigger, constraint)
|
||||||
constraint_msg = "conflict constraint %s" % str(constraint)
|
|
||||||
|
spec_for_msg = (
|
||||||
|
spack.spec.Spec(pkg.name) if constraint == spack.spec.Spec() else constraint
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
constraint_msg = f"conflict applies to spec {str(spec_for_msg)}"
|
||||||
constraint_id = self.condition(constraint, name=pkg.name, msg=constraint_msg)
|
constraint_id = self.condition(constraint, name=pkg.name, msg=constraint_msg)
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(
|
self.gen.fact(
|
||||||
fn.pkg_fact(pkg.name, fn.conflict(trigger_id, constraint_id, conflict_msg))
|
fn.pkg_fact(pkg.name, fn.conflict(trigger_id, constraint_id, conflict_msg))
|
||||||
|
@ -1310,7 +1401,7 @@ def trigger_rules(self):
|
||||||
self.gen.h2("Trigger conditions")
|
self.gen.h2("Trigger conditions")
|
||||||
for name in self._trigger_cache:
|
for name in self._trigger_cache:
|
||||||
cache = self._trigger_cache[name]
|
cache = self._trigger_cache[name]
|
||||||
for spec_str, (trigger_id, requirements) in cache.items():
|
for (spec_str, _), (trigger_id, requirements) in cache.items():
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(name, fn.trigger_id(trigger_id)))
|
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(name, fn.trigger_id(trigger_id)))
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(name, fn.trigger_msg(spec_str)))
|
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(name, fn.trigger_msg(spec_str)))
|
||||||
for predicate in requirements:
|
for predicate in requirements:
|
||||||
|
@ -1323,7 +1414,7 @@ def effect_rules(self):
|
||||||
self.gen.h2("Imposed requirements")
|
self.gen.h2("Imposed requirements")
|
||||||
for name in self._effect_cache:
|
for name in self._effect_cache:
|
||||||
cache = self._effect_cache[name]
|
cache = self._effect_cache[name]
|
||||||
for spec_str, (effect_id, requirements) in cache.items():
|
for (spec_str, _), (effect_id, requirements) in cache.items():
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(name, fn.effect_id(effect_id)))
|
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(name, fn.effect_id(effect_id)))
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(name, fn.effect_msg(spec_str)))
|
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(name, fn.effect_msg(spec_str)))
|
||||||
for predicate in requirements:
|
for predicate in requirements:
|
||||||
|
@ -1422,18 +1513,26 @@ def variant_rules(self, pkg):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
self.gen.newline()
|
self.gen.newline()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def condition(self, required_spec, imposed_spec=None, name=None, msg=None, node=False):
|
def condition(
|
||||||
|
self,
|
||||||
|
required_spec: spack.spec.Spec,
|
||||||
|
imposed_spec: Optional[spack.spec.Spec] = None,
|
||||||
|
name: Optional[str] = None,
|
||||||
|
msg: Optional[str] = None,
|
||||||
|
transform_required: Optional[TransformFunction] = None,
|
||||||
|
transform_imposed: Optional[TransformFunction] = remove_node,
|
||||||
|
):
|
||||||
"""Generate facts for a dependency or virtual provider condition.
|
"""Generate facts for a dependency or virtual provider condition.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Arguments:
|
Arguments:
|
||||||
required_spec (spack.spec.Spec): the spec that triggers this condition
|
required_spec: the constraints that triggers this condition
|
||||||
imposed_spec (spack.spec.Spec or None): the spec with constraints that
|
imposed_spec: the constraints that are imposed when this condition is triggered
|
||||||
are imposed when this condition is triggered
|
name: name for `required_spec` (required if required_spec is anonymous, ignored if not)
|
||||||
name (str or None): name for `required_spec` (required if
|
msg: description of the condition
|
||||||
required_spec is anonymous, ignored if not)
|
transform_required: transformation applied to facts from the required spec. Defaults
|
||||||
msg (str or None): description of the condition
|
to leave facts as they are.
|
||||||
node (bool): if False does not emit "node" or "virtual_node" requirements
|
transform_imposed: transformation applied to facts from the imposed spec. Defaults
|
||||||
from the imposed spec
|
to removing "node" and "virtual_node" facts.
|
||||||
Returns:
|
Returns:
|
||||||
int: id of the condition created by this function
|
int: id of the condition created by this function
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
|
@ -1451,10 +1550,14 @@ def condition(self, required_spec, imposed_spec=None, name=None, msg=None, node=
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
cache = self._trigger_cache[named_cond.name]
|
cache = self._trigger_cache[named_cond.name]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
named_cond_key = str(named_cond)
|
named_cond_key = (str(named_cond), transform_required)
|
||||||
if named_cond_key not in cache:
|
if named_cond_key not in cache:
|
||||||
trigger_id = next(self._trigger_id_counter)
|
trigger_id = next(self._trigger_id_counter)
|
||||||
requirements = self.spec_clauses(named_cond, body=True, required_from=name)
|
requirements = self.spec_clauses(named_cond, body=True, required_from=name)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if transform_required:
|
||||||
|
requirements = transform_required(named_cond, requirements)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
cache[named_cond_key] = (trigger_id, requirements)
|
cache[named_cond_key] = (trigger_id, requirements)
|
||||||
trigger_id, requirements = cache[named_cond_key]
|
trigger_id, requirements = cache[named_cond_key]
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(named_cond.name, fn.condition_trigger(condition_id, trigger_id)))
|
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(named_cond.name, fn.condition_trigger(condition_id, trigger_id)))
|
||||||
|
@ -1463,14 +1566,14 @@ def condition(self, required_spec, imposed_spec=None, name=None, msg=None, node=
|
||||||
return condition_id
|
return condition_id
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
cache = self._effect_cache[named_cond.name]
|
cache = self._effect_cache[named_cond.name]
|
||||||
imposed_spec_key = str(imposed_spec)
|
imposed_spec_key = (str(imposed_spec), transform_imposed)
|
||||||
if imposed_spec_key not in cache:
|
if imposed_spec_key not in cache:
|
||||||
effect_id = next(self._effect_id_counter)
|
effect_id = next(self._effect_id_counter)
|
||||||
requirements = self.spec_clauses(imposed_spec, body=False, required_from=name)
|
requirements = self.spec_clauses(imposed_spec, body=False, required_from=name)
|
||||||
if not node:
|
|
||||||
requirements = list(
|
if transform_imposed:
|
||||||
filter(lambda x: x.args[0] not in ("node", "virtual_node"), requirements)
|
requirements = transform_imposed(imposed_spec, requirements)
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
cache[imposed_spec_key] = (effect_id, requirements)
|
cache[imposed_spec_key] = (effect_id, requirements)
|
||||||
effect_id, requirements = cache[imposed_spec_key]
|
effect_id, requirements = cache[imposed_spec_key]
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(named_cond.name, fn.condition_effect(condition_id, effect_id)))
|
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(named_cond.name, fn.condition_effect(condition_id, effect_id)))
|
||||||
|
@ -1530,21 +1633,32 @@ def package_dependencies_rules(self, pkg):
|
||||||
if not depflag:
|
if not depflag:
|
||||||
continue
|
continue
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
msg = "%s depends on %s" % (pkg.name, dep.spec.name)
|
msg = f"{pkg.name} depends on {dep.spec}"
|
||||||
if cond != spack.spec.Spec():
|
if cond != spack.spec.Spec():
|
||||||
msg += " when %s" % cond
|
msg += f" when {cond}"
|
||||||
else:
|
else:
|
||||||
pass
|
pass
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
condition_id = self.condition(cond, dep.spec, pkg.name, msg)
|
def track_dependencies(input_spec, requirements):
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(
|
return requirements + [fn.attr("track_dependencies", input_spec.name)]
|
||||||
fn.pkg_fact(pkg.name, fn.dependency_condition(condition_id, dep.spec.name))
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for t in dt.ALL_FLAGS:
|
def dependency_holds(input_spec, requirements):
|
||||||
if t & depflag:
|
return remove_node(input_spec, requirements) + [
|
||||||
# there is a declared dependency of type t
|
fn.attr(
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.dependency_type(condition_id, dt.flag_to_string(t)))
|
"dependency_holds", pkg.name, input_spec.name, dt.flag_to_string(t)
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
for t in dt.ALL_FLAGS
|
||||||
|
if t & depflag
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
self.condition(
|
||||||
|
cond,
|
||||||
|
dep.spec,
|
||||||
|
name=pkg.name,
|
||||||
|
msg=msg,
|
||||||
|
transform_required=track_dependencies,
|
||||||
|
transform_imposed=dependency_holds,
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
self.gen.newline()
|
self.gen.newline()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -1639,8 +1753,17 @@ def emit_facts_from_requirement_rules(self, rules: List[RequirementRule]):
|
||||||
when_spec = spack.spec.Spec(pkg_name)
|
when_spec = spack.spec.Spec(pkg_name)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
|
# With virtual we want to emit "node" and "virtual_node" in imposed specs
|
||||||
|
transform: Optional[TransformFunction] = remove_node
|
||||||
|
if virtual:
|
||||||
|
transform = None
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
member_id = self.condition(
|
member_id = self.condition(
|
||||||
required_spec=when_spec, imposed_spec=spec, name=pkg_name, node=virtual
|
required_spec=when_spec,
|
||||||
|
imposed_spec=spec,
|
||||||
|
name=pkg_name,
|
||||||
|
transform_imposed=transform,
|
||||||
|
msg=f"{spec_str} is a requirement for package {pkg_name}",
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
except Exception as e:
|
except Exception as e:
|
||||||
# Do not raise if the rule comes from the 'all' subsection, since usability
|
# Do not raise if the rule comes from the 'all' subsection, since usability
|
||||||
|
@ -1703,8 +1826,16 @@ def external_packages(self):
|
||||||
# Declare external conditions with a local index into packages.yaml
|
# Declare external conditions with a local index into packages.yaml
|
||||||
for local_idx, spec in enumerate(external_specs):
|
for local_idx, spec in enumerate(external_specs):
|
||||||
msg = "%s available as external when satisfying %s" % (spec.name, spec)
|
msg = "%s available as external when satisfying %s" % (spec.name, spec)
|
||||||
condition_id = self.condition(spec, msg=msg)
|
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(pkg_name, fn.possible_external(condition_id, local_idx)))
|
def external_imposition(input_spec, _):
|
||||||
|
return [fn.attr("external_conditions_hold", input_spec.name, local_idx)]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
self.condition(
|
||||||
|
spec,
|
||||||
|
spack.spec.Spec(spec.name),
|
||||||
|
msg=msg,
|
||||||
|
transform_imposed=external_imposition,
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
self.possible_versions[spec.name].add(spec.version)
|
self.possible_versions[spec.name].add(spec.version)
|
||||||
self.gen.newline()
|
self.gen.newline()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -1918,6 +2049,7 @@ class Body:
|
||||||
if not body:
|
if not body:
|
||||||
for virtual in virtuals:
|
for virtual in virtuals:
|
||||||
clauses.append(fn.attr("provider_set", spec.name, virtual))
|
clauses.append(fn.attr("provider_set", spec.name, virtual))
|
||||||
|
clauses.append(fn.attr("virtual_node", virtual))
|
||||||
else:
|
else:
|
||||||
for virtual in virtuals:
|
for virtual in virtuals:
|
||||||
clauses.append(fn.attr("virtual_on_incoming_edges", spec.name, virtual))
|
clauses.append(fn.attr("virtual_on_incoming_edges", spec.name, virtual))
|
||||||
|
@ -2555,20 +2687,45 @@ def setup(
|
||||||
self.define_target_constraints()
|
self.define_target_constraints()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def literal_specs(self, specs):
|
def literal_specs(self, specs):
|
||||||
for idx, spec in enumerate(specs):
|
for spec in specs:
|
||||||
self.gen.h2("Spec: %s" % str(spec))
|
self.gen.h2("Spec: %s" % str(spec))
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.literal(idx))
|
condition_id = next(self._condition_id_counter)
|
||||||
|
trigger_id = next(self._trigger_id_counter)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.literal(idx, "virtual_root" if spec.virtual else "root", spec.name))
|
# Special condition triggered by "literal_solved"
|
||||||
for clause in self.spec_clauses(spec):
|
self.gen.fact(fn.literal(trigger_id))
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.literal(idx, *clause.args))
|
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(spec.name, fn.condition_trigger(condition_id, trigger_id)))
|
||||||
if clause.args[0] == "variant_set":
|
self.gen.fact(fn.condition_reason(condition_id, f"{spec} requested from CLI"))
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(
|
|
||||||
fn.literal(idx, "variant_default_value_from_cli", *clause.args[1:])
|
# Effect imposes the spec
|
||||||
|
imposed_spec_key = str(spec), None
|
||||||
|
cache = self._effect_cache[spec.name]
|
||||||
|
msg = (
|
||||||
|
"literal specs have different requirements. clear cache before computing literals"
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
assert imposed_spec_key not in cache, msg
|
||||||
|
effect_id = next(self._effect_id_counter)
|
||||||
|
requirements = self.spec_clauses(spec)
|
||||||
|
root_name = spec.name
|
||||||
|
for clause in requirements:
|
||||||
|
clause_name = clause.args[0]
|
||||||
|
if clause_name == "variant_set":
|
||||||
|
requirements.append(
|
||||||
|
fn.attr("variant_default_value_from_cli", *clause.args[1:])
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
elif clause_name in ("node", "virtual_node", "hash"):
|
||||||
|
# These facts are needed to compute the "condition_set" of the root
|
||||||
|
pkg_name = clause.args[1]
|
||||||
|
self.gen.fact(fn.mentioned_in_literal(trigger_id, root_name, pkg_name))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
requirements.append(fn.attr("virtual_root" if spec.virtual else "root", spec.name))
|
||||||
|
cache[imposed_spec_key] = (effect_id, requirements)
|
||||||
|
self.gen.fact(fn.pkg_fact(spec.name, fn.condition_effect(condition_id, effect_id)))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if self.concretize_everything:
|
if self.concretize_everything:
|
||||||
self.gen.fact(fn.solve_literal(idx))
|
self.gen.fact(fn.solve_literal(trigger_id))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
self.effect_rules()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def validate_and_define_versions_from_requirements(
|
def validate_and_define_versions_from_requirements(
|
||||||
self, *, allow_deprecated: bool, require_checksum: bool
|
self, *, allow_deprecated: bool, require_checksum: bool
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -10,9 +10,8 @@
|
||||||
% ID of the nodes in the "root" link-run sub-DAG
|
% ID of the nodes in the "root" link-run sub-DAG
|
||||||
#const min_dupe_id = 0.
|
#const min_dupe_id = 0.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#const link_run = 0.
|
#const direct_link_run = 0.
|
||||||
#const direct_link_run =1.
|
#const direct_build = 1.
|
||||||
#const direct_build = 2.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Allow clingo to create nodes
|
% Allow clingo to create nodes
|
||||||
{ attr("node", node(0..X-1, Package)) } :- max_dupes(Package, X), not virtual(Package).
|
{ attr("node", node(0..X-1, Package)) } :- max_dupes(Package, X), not virtual(Package).
|
||||||
|
@ -30,23 +29,21 @@
|
||||||
:- attr("variant_value", PackageNode, _, _), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
:- attr("variant_value", PackageNode, _, _), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
||||||
:- attr("node_flag_compiler_default", PackageNode), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
:- attr("node_flag_compiler_default", PackageNode), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
||||||
:- attr("node_flag", PackageNode, _, _), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
:- attr("node_flag", PackageNode, _, _), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
||||||
:- attr("node_flag_source", PackageNode, _, _), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
|
||||||
:- attr("no_flags", PackageNode, _), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
:- attr("no_flags", PackageNode, _), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
||||||
:- attr("external_spec_selected", PackageNode, _), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
:- attr("external_spec_selected", PackageNode, _), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
||||||
:- attr("depends_on", ParentNode, _, _), not attr("node", ParentNode).
|
:- attr("depends_on", ParentNode, _, _), not attr("node", ParentNode).
|
||||||
:- attr("depends_on", _, ChildNode, _), not attr("node", ChildNode).
|
:- attr("depends_on", _, ChildNode, _), not attr("node", ChildNode).
|
||||||
:- attr("node_flag_source", ParentNode, _, _), not attr("node", ParentNode).
|
:- attr("node_flag_source", ParentNode, _, _), not attr("node", ParentNode).
|
||||||
:- attr("node_flag_source", _, _, ChildNode), not attr("node", ChildNode).
|
:- attr("node_flag_source", _, _, ChildNode), not attr("node", ChildNode).
|
||||||
|
:- attr("virtual_node", VirtualNode), not provider(_, VirtualNode), internal_error("virtual node with no provider").
|
||||||
|
:- provider(_, VirtualNode), not attr("virtual_node", VirtualNode), internal_error("provider with no virtual node").
|
||||||
|
:- provider(PackageNode, _), not attr("node", PackageNode), internal_error("provider with no real node").
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
:- attr("virtual_node", VirtualNode), not provider(_, VirtualNode).
|
:- attr("root", node(ID, PackageNode)), ID > min_dupe_id, internal_error("root with a non-minimal duplicate ID").
|
||||||
:- provider(_, VirtualNode), not attr("virtual_node", VirtualNode).
|
|
||||||
:- provider(PackageNode, _), not attr("node", PackageNode).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
:- attr("root", node(ID, PackageNode)), ID > min_dupe_id.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Nodes in the "root" unification set cannot depend on non-root nodes if the dependency is "link" or "run"
|
% Nodes in the "root" unification set cannot depend on non-root nodes if the dependency is "link" or "run"
|
||||||
:- attr("depends_on", node(min_dupe_id, Package), node(ID, _), "link"), ID != min_dupe_id, unification_set("root", node(min_dupe_id, Package)).
|
:- attr("depends_on", node(min_dupe_id, Package), node(ID, _), "link"), ID != min_dupe_id, unification_set("root", node(min_dupe_id, Package)), internal_error("link dependency out of the root unification set").
|
||||||
:- attr("depends_on", node(min_dupe_id, Package), node(ID, _), "run"), ID != min_dupe_id, unification_set("root", node(min_dupe_id, Package)).
|
:- attr("depends_on", node(min_dupe_id, Package), node(ID, _), "run"), ID != min_dupe_id, unification_set("root", node(min_dupe_id, Package)), internal_error("run dependency out of the root unification set").
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Rules on "unification sets", i.e. on sets of nodes allowing a single configuration of any given package
|
% Rules on "unification sets", i.e. on sets of nodes allowing a single configuration of any given package
|
||||||
unify(SetID, PackageName) :- unification_set(SetID, node(_, PackageName)).
|
unify(SetID, PackageName) :- unification_set(SetID, node(_, PackageName)).
|
||||||
|
@ -86,22 +83,24 @@ unification_set(SetID, VirtualNode)
|
||||||
%----
|
%----
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% In the "root" unification set only ID = 0 are allowed
|
% In the "root" unification set only ID = 0 are allowed
|
||||||
:- unification_set("root", node(ID, _)), ID != 0.
|
:- unification_set("root", node(ID, _)), ID != 0, internal_error("root unification set has node with non-zero unification set ID").
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% In the "root" unification set we allow only packages from the link-run possible subDAG
|
% In the "root" unification set we allow only packages from the link-run possible subDAG
|
||||||
:- unification_set("root", node(_, Package)), not possible_in_link_run(Package), not virtual(Package).
|
:- unification_set("root", node(_, Package)), not possible_in_link_run(Package), not virtual(Package), internal_error("package outside possible link/run graph in root unification set").
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Each node must belong to at least one unification set
|
% Each node must belong to at least one unification set
|
||||||
:- attr("node", PackageNode), not unification_set(_, PackageNode).
|
:- attr("node", PackageNode), not unification_set(_, PackageNode), internal_error("node belongs to no unification set").
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Cannot have a node with an ID, if lower ID of the same package are not used
|
% Cannot have a node with an ID, if lower ID of the same package are not used
|
||||||
:- attr("node", node(ID1, Package)),
|
:- attr("node", node(ID1, Package)),
|
||||||
not attr("node", node(ID2, Package)),
|
not attr("node", node(ID2, Package)),
|
||||||
max_dupes(Package, X), ID1=0..X-1, ID2=0..X-1, ID2 < ID1.
|
max_dupes(Package, X), ID1=0..X-1, ID2=0..X-1, ID2 < ID1,
|
||||||
|
internal_error("node skipped id number").
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
:- attr("virtual_node", node(ID1, Package)),
|
:- attr("virtual_node", node(ID1, Package)),
|
||||||
not attr("virtual_node", node(ID2, Package)),
|
not attr("virtual_node", node(ID2, Package)),
|
||||||
max_dupes(Package, X), ID1=0..X-1, ID2=0..X-1, ID2 < ID1.
|
max_dupes(Package, X), ID1=0..X-1, ID2=0..X-1, ID2 < ID1,
|
||||||
|
internal_error("virtual node skipped id number").
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
% Map literal input specs to facts that drive the solve
|
% Map literal input specs to facts that drive the solve
|
||||||
|
@ -115,29 +114,28 @@ multiple_nodes_attribute("depends_on").
|
||||||
multiple_nodes_attribute("virtual_on_edge").
|
multiple_nodes_attribute("virtual_on_edge").
|
||||||
multiple_nodes_attribute("provider_set").
|
multiple_nodes_attribute("provider_set").
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Map constraint on the literal ID to facts on the node
|
trigger_condition_holds(TriggerID, node(min_dupe_id, Package)) :-
|
||||||
attr(Name, node(min_dupe_id, A1)) :- literal(LiteralID, Name, A1), solve_literal(LiteralID).
|
solve_literal(TriggerID),
|
||||||
attr(Name, node(min_dupe_id, A1), A2) :- literal(LiteralID, Name, A1, A2), solve_literal(LiteralID), not multiple_nodes_attribute(Name).
|
pkg_fact(Package, condition_trigger(_, TriggerID)),
|
||||||
attr(Name, node(min_dupe_id, A1), A2, A3) :- literal(LiteralID, Name, A1, A2, A3), solve_literal(LiteralID), not multiple_nodes_attribute(Name).
|
literal(TriggerID).
|
||||||
attr(Name, node(min_dupe_id, A1), A2, A3, A4) :- literal(LiteralID, Name, A1, A2, A3, A4), solve_literal(LiteralID).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Special cases where nodes occur in arguments other than A1
|
trigger_node(TriggerID, Node, Node) :-
|
||||||
attr("node_flag_source", node(min_dupe_id, A1), A2, node(min_dupe_id, A3)) :- literal(LiteralID, "node_flag_source", A1, A2, A3), solve_literal(LiteralID).
|
trigger_condition_holds(TriggerID, Node),
|
||||||
attr("depends_on", node(min_dupe_id, A1), node(min_dupe_id, A2), A3) :- literal(LiteralID, "depends_on", A1, A2, A3), solve_literal(LiteralID).
|
literal(TriggerID).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
attr("virtual_node", node(min_dupe_id, Virtual)) :- literal(LiteralID, "provider_set", _, Virtual), solve_literal(LiteralID).
|
% Since we trigger the existence of literal nodes from a condition, we need to construct
|
||||||
attr("provider_set", node(min_dupe_id, Provider), node(min_dupe_id, Virtual)) :- literal(LiteralID, "provider_set", Provider, Virtual), solve_literal(LiteralID).
|
% the condition_set/2 manually below
|
||||||
provider(node(min_dupe_id, Provider), node(min_dupe_id, Virtual)) :- literal(LiteralID, "provider_set", Provider, Virtual), solve_literal(LiteralID).
|
mentioned_in_literal(Root, Mentioned) :- mentioned_in_literal(TriggerID, Root, Mentioned), solve_literal(TriggerID).
|
||||||
|
condition_set(node(min_dupe_id, Root), node(min_dupe_id, Mentioned)) :- mentioned_in_literal(Root, Mentioned).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Discriminate between "roots" that have been explicitly requested, and roots that are deduced from "virtual roots"
|
% Discriminate between "roots" that have been explicitly requested, and roots that are deduced from "virtual roots"
|
||||||
explicitly_requested_root(node(min_dupe_id, A1)) :- literal(LiteralID, "root", A1), solve_literal(LiteralID).
|
explicitly_requested_root(node(min_dupe_id, Package)) :-
|
||||||
|
solve_literal(TriggerID),
|
||||||
|
trigger_and_effect(Package, TriggerID, EffectID),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EffectID, "root", Package).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#defined concretize_everything/0.
|
#defined concretize_everything/0.
|
||||||
#defined literal/1.
|
#defined literal/1.
|
||||||
#defined literal/3.
|
|
||||||
#defined literal/4.
|
|
||||||
#defined literal/5.
|
|
||||||
#defined literal/6.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Attributes for node packages which must have a single value
|
% Attributes for node packages which must have a single value
|
||||||
attr_single_value("version").
|
attr_single_value("version").
|
||||||
|
@ -235,7 +233,8 @@ possible_version_weight(node(ID, Package), Weight)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1 { version_weight(node(ID, Package), Weight) : pkg_fact(Package, version_declared(Version, Weight)) } 1
|
1 { version_weight(node(ID, Package), Weight) : pkg_fact(Package, version_declared(Version, Weight)) } 1
|
||||||
:- attr("version", node(ID, Package), Version),
|
:- attr("version", node(ID, Package), Version),
|
||||||
attr("node", node(ID, Package)).
|
attr("node", node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
internal_error("version weights must exist and be unique").
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% node_version_satisfies implies that exactly one of the satisfying versions
|
% node_version_satisfies implies that exactly one of the satisfying versions
|
||||||
% is the package's version, and vice versa.
|
% is the package's version, and vice versa.
|
||||||
|
@ -249,7 +248,8 @@ possible_version_weight(node(ID, Package), Weight)
|
||||||
% bound on the choice rule to avoid false positives with the error below
|
% bound on the choice rule to avoid false positives with the error below
|
||||||
1 { attr("version", node(ID, Package), Version) : pkg_fact(Package, version_satisfies(Constraint, Version)) }
|
1 { attr("version", node(ID, Package), Version) : pkg_fact(Package, version_satisfies(Constraint, Version)) }
|
||||||
:- attr("node_version_satisfies", node(ID, Package), Constraint),
|
:- attr("node_version_satisfies", node(ID, Package), Constraint),
|
||||||
pkg_fact(Package, version_satisfies(Constraint, _)).
|
pkg_fact(Package, version_satisfies(Constraint, _)),
|
||||||
|
internal_error("must choose a single version to satisfy version constraints").
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% More specific error message if the version cannot satisfy some constraint
|
% More specific error message if the version cannot satisfy some constraint
|
||||||
% Otherwise covered by `no_version_error` and `versions_conflict_error`.
|
% Otherwise covered by `no_version_error` and `versions_conflict_error`.
|
||||||
|
@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ imposed_nodes(ConditionID, PackageNode, node(X, A1))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Conditions that hold impose may impose constraints on other specs
|
% Conditions that hold impose may impose constraints on other specs
|
||||||
attr(Name, node(X, A1)) :- impose(ID, PackageNode), imposed_constraint(ID, Name, A1), imposed_nodes(ID, PackageNode, node(X, A1)).
|
attr(Name, node(X, A1)) :- impose(ID, PackageNode), imposed_constraint(ID, Name, A1), imposed_nodes(ID, PackageNode, node(X, A1)).
|
||||||
attr(Name, node(X, A1), A2) :- impose(ID, PackageNode), imposed_constraint(ID, Name, A1, A2), imposed_nodes(ID, PackageNode, node(X, A1)).
|
attr(Name, node(X, A1), A2) :- impose(ID, PackageNode), imposed_constraint(ID, Name, A1, A2), imposed_nodes(ID, PackageNode, node(X, A1)), not multiple_nodes_attribute(Name).
|
||||||
attr(Name, node(X, A1), A2, A3) :- impose(ID, PackageNode), imposed_constraint(ID, Name, A1, A2, A3), imposed_nodes(ID, PackageNode, node(X, A1)), not multiple_nodes_attribute(Name).
|
attr(Name, node(X, A1), A2, A3) :- impose(ID, PackageNode), imposed_constraint(ID, Name, A1, A2, A3), imposed_nodes(ID, PackageNode, node(X, A1)), not multiple_nodes_attribute(Name).
|
||||||
attr(Name, node(X, A1), A2, A3, A4) :- impose(ID, PackageNode), imposed_constraint(ID, Name, A1, A2, A3, A4), imposed_nodes(ID, PackageNode, node(X, A1)).
|
attr(Name, node(X, A1), A2, A3, A4) :- impose(ID, PackageNode), imposed_constraint(ID, Name, A1, A2, A3, A4), imposed_nodes(ID, PackageNode, node(X, A1)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -373,6 +373,16 @@ attr("node_flag_source", node(X, A1), A2, node(Y, A3))
|
||||||
imposed_constraint(ID, "node_flag_source", A1, A2, A3),
|
imposed_constraint(ID, "node_flag_source", A1, A2, A3),
|
||||||
condition_set(node(Y, A3), node(X, A1)).
|
condition_set(node(Y, A3), node(X, A1)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% Provider set is relevant only for literals, since it's the only place where `^[virtuals=foo] bar`
|
||||||
|
% might appear in the HEAD of a rule
|
||||||
|
attr("provider_set", node(min_dupe_id, Provider), node(min_dupe_id, Virtual))
|
||||||
|
:- solve_literal(TriggerID),
|
||||||
|
trigger_and_effect(_, TriggerID, EffectID),
|
||||||
|
impose(EffectID, _),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EffectID, "provider_set", Provider, Virtual).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
provider(ProviderNode, VirtualNode) :- attr("provider_set", ProviderNode, VirtualNode).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Here we can't use the condition set because it's a recursive definition, that doesn't define the
|
% Here we can't use the condition set because it's a recursive definition, that doesn't define the
|
||||||
% node index, and leads to unsatisfiability. Hence we say that one and only one node index must
|
% node index, and leads to unsatisfiability. Hence we say that one and only one node index must
|
||||||
% satisfy the dependency.
|
% satisfy the dependency.
|
||||||
|
@ -432,24 +442,11 @@ depends_on(PackageNode, DependencyNode) :- attr("depends_on", PackageNode, Depen
|
||||||
% concrete. We chop off dependencies for externals, and dependencies of
|
% concrete. We chop off dependencies for externals, and dependencies of
|
||||||
% concrete specs don't need to be resolved -- they arise from the concrete
|
% concrete specs don't need to be resolved -- they arise from the concrete
|
||||||
% specs themselves.
|
% specs themselves.
|
||||||
dependency_holds(node(NodeID, Package), Dependency, Type) :-
|
attr("track_dependencies", Node) :- build(Node), not external(Node).
|
||||||
pkg_fact(Package, dependency_condition(ID, Dependency)),
|
|
||||||
dependency_type(ID, Type),
|
|
||||||
build(node(NodeID, Package)),
|
|
||||||
not external(node(NodeID, Package)),
|
|
||||||
condition_holds(ID, node(NodeID, Package)).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% We cut off dependencies of externals (as we don't really know them).
|
|
||||||
% Don't impose constraints on dependencies that don't exist.
|
|
||||||
do_not_impose(EffectID, node(NodeID, Package)) :-
|
|
||||||
not dependency_holds(node(NodeID, Package), Dependency, _),
|
|
||||||
attr("node", node(NodeID, Package)),
|
|
||||||
pkg_fact(Package, dependency_condition(ID, Dependency)),
|
|
||||||
pkg_fact(Package, condition_effect(ID, EffectID)).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% If a dependency holds on a package node, there must be one and only one dependency node satisfying it
|
% If a dependency holds on a package node, there must be one and only one dependency node satisfying it
|
||||||
1 { attr("depends_on", PackageNode, node(0..Y-1, Dependency), Type) : max_dupes(Dependency, Y) } 1
|
1 { attr("depends_on", PackageNode, node(0..Y-1, Dependency), Type) : max_dupes(Dependency, Y) } 1
|
||||||
:- dependency_holds(PackageNode, Dependency, Type),
|
:- attr("dependency_holds", PackageNode, Dependency, Type),
|
||||||
not virtual(Dependency).
|
not virtual(Dependency).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% all nodes in the graph must be reachable from some root
|
% all nodes in the graph must be reachable from some root
|
||||||
|
@ -499,7 +496,7 @@ error(100, "Package '{0}' needs to provide both '{1}' and '{2}' together, but pr
|
||||||
% if a package depends on a virtual, it's not external and we have a
|
% if a package depends on a virtual, it's not external and we have a
|
||||||
% provider for that virtual then it depends on the provider
|
% provider for that virtual then it depends on the provider
|
||||||
node_depends_on_virtual(PackageNode, Virtual, Type)
|
node_depends_on_virtual(PackageNode, Virtual, Type)
|
||||||
:- dependency_holds(PackageNode, Virtual, Type),
|
:- attr("dependency_holds", PackageNode, Virtual, Type),
|
||||||
virtual(Virtual),
|
virtual(Virtual),
|
||||||
not external(PackageNode).
|
not external(PackageNode).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -509,7 +506,7 @@ node_depends_on_virtual(PackageNode, Virtual) :- node_depends_on_virtual(Package
|
||||||
:- node_depends_on_virtual(PackageNode, Virtual, Type).
|
:- node_depends_on_virtual(PackageNode, Virtual, Type).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
attr("virtual_on_edge", PackageNode, ProviderNode, Virtual)
|
attr("virtual_on_edge", PackageNode, ProviderNode, Virtual)
|
||||||
:- dependency_holds(PackageNode, Virtual, Type),
|
:- attr("dependency_holds", PackageNode, Virtual, Type),
|
||||||
attr("depends_on", PackageNode, ProviderNode, Type),
|
attr("depends_on", PackageNode, ProviderNode, Type),
|
||||||
provider(ProviderNode, node(_, Virtual)),
|
provider(ProviderNode, node(_, Virtual)),
|
||||||
not external(PackageNode).
|
not external(PackageNode).
|
||||||
|
@ -624,11 +621,11 @@ possible_provider_weight(node(DependencyID, Dependency), VirtualNode, 100, "fall
|
||||||
pkg_fact(Package, version_declared(Version, Weight, "external")) }
|
pkg_fact(Package, version_declared(Version, Weight, "external")) }
|
||||||
:- external(node(ID, Package)).
|
:- external(node(ID, Package)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
error(100, "Attempted to use external for '{0}' which does not satisfy any configured external spec", Package)
|
error(100, "Attempted to use external for '{0}' which does not satisfy any configured external spec version", Package)
|
||||||
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
not external_version(node(ID, Package), _, _).
|
not external_version(node(ID, Package), _, _).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
error(100, "Attempted to use external for '{0}' which does not satisfy any configured external spec", Package)
|
error(100, "Attempted to use external for '{0}' which does not satisfy a unique configured external spec version", Package)
|
||||||
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
2 { external_version(node(ID, Package), Version, Weight) }.
|
2 { external_version(node(ID, Package), Version, Weight) }.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -657,18 +654,15 @@ external(PackageNode) :- attr("external_spec_selected", PackageNode, _).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% determine if an external spec has been selected
|
% determine if an external spec has been selected
|
||||||
attr("external_spec_selected", node(ID, Package), LocalIndex) :-
|
attr("external_spec_selected", node(ID, Package), LocalIndex) :-
|
||||||
external_conditions_hold(node(ID, Package), LocalIndex),
|
attr("external_conditions_hold", node(ID, Package), LocalIndex),
|
||||||
attr("node", node(ID, Package)),
|
attr("node", node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
not attr("hash", node(ID, Package), _).
|
not attr("hash", node(ID, Package), _).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
external_conditions_hold(node(PackageID, Package), LocalIndex) :-
|
|
||||||
pkg_fact(Package, possible_external(ID, LocalIndex)), condition_holds(ID, node(PackageID, Package)).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% it cannot happen that a spec is external, but none of the external specs
|
% it cannot happen that a spec is external, but none of the external specs
|
||||||
% conditions hold.
|
% conditions hold.
|
||||||
error(100, "Attempted to use external for '{0}' which does not satisfy any configured external spec", Package)
|
error(100, "Attempted to use external for '{0}' which does not satisfy any configured external spec", Package)
|
||||||
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
not external_conditions_hold(node(ID, Package), _).
|
not attr("external_conditions_hold", node(ID, Package), _).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
% Config required semantics
|
% Config required semantics
|
||||||
|
@ -887,8 +881,9 @@ variant_default_not_used(node(ID, Package), Variant, Value)
|
||||||
% The variant is set in an external spec
|
% The variant is set in an external spec
|
||||||
external_with_variant_set(node(NodeID, Package), Variant, Value)
|
external_with_variant_set(node(NodeID, Package), Variant, Value)
|
||||||
:- attr("variant_value", node(NodeID, Package), Variant, Value),
|
:- attr("variant_value", node(NodeID, Package), Variant, Value),
|
||||||
condition_requirement(ID, "variant_value", Package, Variant, Value),
|
condition_requirement(TriggerID, "variant_value", Package, Variant, Value),
|
||||||
pkg_fact(Package, possible_external(ID, _)),
|
trigger_and_effect(Package, TriggerID, EffectID),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EffectID, "external_conditions_hold", Package, _),
|
||||||
external(node(NodeID, Package)),
|
external(node(NodeID, Package)),
|
||||||
attr("node", node(NodeID, Package)).
|
attr("node", node(NodeID, Package)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -24,4 +24,29 @@
|
||||||
#show error/5.
|
#show error/5.
|
||||||
#show error/6.
|
#show error/6.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% for error causation
|
||||||
|
#show condition_reason/2.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% For error messages to use later
|
||||||
|
#show pkg_fact/2.
|
||||||
|
#show condition_holds/2.
|
||||||
|
#show imposed_constraint/3.
|
||||||
|
#show imposed_constraint/4.
|
||||||
|
#show imposed_constraint/5.
|
||||||
|
#show imposed_constraint/6.
|
||||||
|
#show condition_requirement/3.
|
||||||
|
#show condition_requirement/4.
|
||||||
|
#show condition_requirement/5.
|
||||||
|
#show condition_requirement/6.
|
||||||
|
#show node_has_variant/2.
|
||||||
|
#show build/1.
|
||||||
|
#show external/1.
|
||||||
|
#show external_version/3.
|
||||||
|
#show trigger_and_effect/3.
|
||||||
|
#show unification_set/2.
|
||||||
|
#show provider/2.
|
||||||
|
#show condition_nodes/3.
|
||||||
|
#show trigger_node/3.
|
||||||
|
#show imposed_nodes/3.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% debug
|
% debug
|
||||||
|
|
239
lib/spack/spack/solver/error_messages.lp
Normal file
239
lib/spack/spack/solver/error_messages.lp
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
|
||||||
|
% Copyright 2013-2023 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC and other
|
||||||
|
% Spack Project Developers. See the top-level COPYRIGHT file for details.
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
|
% SPDX-License-Identifier: (Apache-2.0 OR MIT)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%=============================================================================
|
||||||
|
% This logic program adds detailed error messages to Spack's concretizer
|
||||||
|
%=============================================================================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#program error_messages.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% Create a causal tree between trigger conditions by locating the effect conditions
|
||||||
|
% that are triggers for another condition. Condition2 is caused by Condition1
|
||||||
|
condition_cause(Condition2, ID2, Condition1, ID1) :-
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Condition2, node(ID2, Package2)),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package2, condition_trigger(Condition2, Trigger)),
|
||||||
|
condition_requirement(Trigger, Name, Package),
|
||||||
|
condition_nodes(Trigger, TriggerNode, node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
trigger_node(Trigger, TriggerNode, node(ID2, Package2)),
|
||||||
|
attr(Name, node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Condition1, node(ID1, Package1)),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package1, condition_effect(Condition1, Effect)),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(Effect, Name, Package),
|
||||||
|
imposed_nodes(Effect, node(ID1, Package1), node(ID, Package)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
condition_cause(Condition2, ID2, Condition1, ID1) :-
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Condition2, node(ID2, Package2)),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package2, condition_trigger(Condition2, Trigger)),
|
||||||
|
condition_requirement(Trigger, Name, Package, A1),
|
||||||
|
condition_nodes(Trigger, TriggerNode, node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
trigger_node(Trigger, TriggerNode, node(ID2, Package2)),
|
||||||
|
attr(Name, node(ID, Package), A1),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Condition1, node(ID1, Package1)),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package1, condition_effect(Condition1, Effect)),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(Effect, Name, Package, A1),
|
||||||
|
imposed_nodes(Effect, node(ID1, Package1), node(ID, Package)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
condition_cause(Condition2, ID2, Condition1, ID1) :-
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Condition2, node(ID2, Package2)),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package2, condition_trigger(Condition2, Trigger)),
|
||||||
|
condition_requirement(Trigger, Name, Package, A1, A2),
|
||||||
|
condition_nodes(Trigger, TriggerNode, node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
trigger_node(Trigger, TriggerNode, node(ID2, Package2)),
|
||||||
|
attr(Name, node(ID, Package), A1, A2),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Condition1, node(ID1, Package1)),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package1, condition_effect(Condition1, Effect)),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(Effect, Name, Package, A1, A2),
|
||||||
|
imposed_nodes(Effect, node(ID1, Package1), node(ID, Package)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
condition_cause(Condition2, ID2, Condition1, ID1) :-
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Condition2, node(ID2, Package2)),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package2, condition_trigger(Condition2, Trigger)),
|
||||||
|
condition_requirement(Trigger, Name, Package, A1, A2, A3),
|
||||||
|
condition_nodes(Trigger, TriggerNode, node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
trigger_node(Trigger, TriggerNode, node(ID2, Package2)),
|
||||||
|
attr(Name, node(ID, Package), A1, A2, A3),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Condition1, node(ID1, Package1)),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package1, condition_effect(Condition1, Effect)),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(Effect, Name, Package, A1, A2, A3),
|
||||||
|
imposed_nodes(Effect, node(ID1, Package1), node(ID, Package)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% special condition cause for dependency conditions
|
||||||
|
% we can't simply impose the existence of the node for dependency conditions
|
||||||
|
% because we need to allow for the choice of which dupe ID the node gets
|
||||||
|
condition_cause(Condition2, ID2, Condition1, ID1) :-
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Condition2, node(ID2, Package2)),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package2, condition_trigger(Condition2, Trigger)),
|
||||||
|
condition_requirement(Trigger, "node", Package),
|
||||||
|
condition_nodes(Trigger, TriggerNode, node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
trigger_node(Trigger, TriggerNode, node(ID2, Package2)),
|
||||||
|
attr("node", node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Condition1, node(ID1, Package1)),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package1, condition_effect(Condition1, Effect)),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(Effect, "dependency_holds", Parent, Package, Type),
|
||||||
|
imposed_nodes(Effect, node(ID1, Package1), node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
attr("depends_on", node(X, Parent), node(ID, Package), Type).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% The literal startcauses is used to separate the variables that are part of the error from the
|
||||||
|
% ones describing the causal tree of the error. After startcauses, each successive pair must be
|
||||||
|
% a condition and a condition_set id for which it holds.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% More specific error message if the version cannot satisfy some constraint
|
||||||
|
% Otherwise covered by `no_version_error` and `versions_conflict_error`.
|
||||||
|
error(1, "Cannot satisfy '{0}@{1}'", Package, Constraint, startcauses, ConstraintCause, CauseID)
|
||||||
|
:- attr("node_version_satisfies", node(ID, Package), Constraint),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(TriggerPkg, condition_effect(ConstraintCause, EffectID)),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EffectID, "node_version_satisfies", Package, Constraint),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(ConstraintCause, node(CauseID, TriggerPkg)),
|
||||||
|
attr("version", node(ID, Package), Version),
|
||||||
|
not pkg_fact(Package, version_satisfies(Constraint, Version)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
error(0, "Cannot satisfy '{0}@{1}' and '{0}@{2}", Package, Constraint1, Constraint2, startcauses, Cause1, C1ID, Cause2, C2ID)
|
||||||
|
:- attr("node_version_satisfies", node(ID, Package), Constraint1),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(TriggerPkg1, condition_effect(Cause1, EffectID1)),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EffectID1, "node_version_satisfies", Package, Constraint1),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Cause1, node(C1ID, TriggerPkg1)),
|
||||||
|
% two constraints
|
||||||
|
attr("node_version_satisfies", node(ID, Package), Constraint2),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(TriggerPkg2, condition_effect(Cause2, EffectID2)),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EffectID2, "node_version_satisfies", Package, Constraint2),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Cause2, node(C2ID, TriggerPkg2)),
|
||||||
|
% version chosen
|
||||||
|
attr("version", node(ID, Package), Version),
|
||||||
|
% version satisfies one but not the other
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package, version_satisfies(Constraint1, Version)),
|
||||||
|
not pkg_fact(Package, version_satisfies(Constraint2, Version)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% causation tracking error for no or multiple virtual providers
|
||||||
|
error(0, "Cannot find a valid provider for virtual {0}", Virtual, startcauses, Cause, CID)
|
||||||
|
:- attr("virtual_node", node(X, Virtual)),
|
||||||
|
not provider(_, node(X, Virtual)),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EID, "dependency_holds", Parent, Virtual, Type),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(TriggerPkg, condition_effect(Cause, EID)),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Cause, node(CID, TriggerPkg)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% At most one variant value for single-valued variants
|
||||||
|
error(0, "'{0}' required multiple values for single-valued variant '{1}'\n Requested 'Spec({1}={2})' and 'Spec({1}={3})'", Package, Variant, Value1, Value2, startcauses, Cause1, X, Cause2, X)
|
||||||
|
:- attr("node", node(X, Package)),
|
||||||
|
node_has_variant(node(X, Package), Variant),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package, variant_single_value(Variant)),
|
||||||
|
build(node(X, Package)),
|
||||||
|
attr("variant_value", node(X, Package), Variant, Value1),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EID1, "variant_set", Package, Variant, Value1),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(TriggerPkg1, condition_effect(Cause1, EID1)),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Cause1, node(X, TriggerPkg1)),
|
||||||
|
attr("variant_value", node(X, Package), Variant, Value2),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EID2, "variant_set", Package, Variant, Value2),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(TriggerPkg2, condition_effect(Cause2, EID2)),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(Cause2, node(X, TriggerPkg2)),
|
||||||
|
Value1 < Value2. % see[1] in concretize.lp
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% Externals have to specify external conditions
|
||||||
|
error(0, "Attempted to use external for {0} which does not satisfy any configured external spec version", Package, startcauses, ExternalCause, CID)
|
||||||
|
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
attr("external_spec_selected", node(ID, Package), Index),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EID, "external_conditions_hold", Package, Index),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(TriggerPkg, condition_effect(ExternalCause, EID)),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(ExternalCause, node(CID, TriggerPkg)),
|
||||||
|
not external_version(node(ID, Package), _, _).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
error(0, "Attempted to build package {0} which is not buildable and does not have a satisfying external\n attr('{1}', '{2}') is an external constraint for {0} which was not satisfied", Package, Name, A1)
|
||||||
|
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
not attr("external_conditions_hold", node(ID, Package), _),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EID, "external_conditions_hold", Package, _),
|
||||||
|
trigger_and_effect(Package, TID, EID),
|
||||||
|
condition_requirement(TID, Name, A1),
|
||||||
|
not attr(Name, node(_, A1)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
error(0, "Attempted to build package {0} which is not buildable and does not have a satisfying external\n attr('{1}', '{2}', '{3}') is an external constraint for {0} which was not satisfied", Package, Name, A1, A2)
|
||||||
|
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
not attr("external_conditions_hold", node(ID, Package), _),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EID, "external_conditions_hold", Package, _),
|
||||||
|
trigger_and_effect(Package, TID, EID),
|
||||||
|
condition_requirement(TID, Name, A1, A2),
|
||||||
|
not attr(Name, node(_, A1), A2).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
error(0, "Attempted to build package {0} which is not buildable and does not have a satisfying external\n attr('{1}', '{2}', '{3}', '{4}') is an external constraint for {0} which was not satisfied", Package, Name, A1, A2, A3)
|
||||||
|
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
not attr("external_conditions_hold", node(ID, Package), _),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EID, "external_conditions_hold", Package, _),
|
||||||
|
trigger_and_effect(Package, TID, EID),
|
||||||
|
condition_requirement(TID, Name, A1, A2, A3),
|
||||||
|
not attr(Name, node(_, A1), A2, A3).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
error(0, "Attempted to build package {0} which is not buildable and does not have a satisfying external\n 'Spec({0} {1}={2})' is an external constraint for {0} which was not satisfied\n 'Spec({0} {1}={3})' required", Package, Variant, Value, OtherValue, startcauses, OtherValueCause, CID)
|
||||||
|
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
not attr("external_conditions_hold", node(ID, Package), _),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EID, "external_conditions_hold", Package, _),
|
||||||
|
trigger_and_effect(Package, TID, EID),
|
||||||
|
condition_requirement(TID, "variant_value", Package, Variant, Value),
|
||||||
|
not attr("variant_value", node(ID, Package), Variant, Value),
|
||||||
|
attr("variant_value", node(ID, Package), Variant, OtherValue),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EID2, "variant_set", Package, Variant, OtherValue),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(TriggerPkg, condition_effect(OtherValueCause, EID2)),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(OtherValueCause, node(CID, TriggerPkg)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
error(0, "Attempted to build package {0} which is not buildable and does not have a satisfying external\n attr('{1}', '{2}', '{3}', '{4}', '{5}') is an external constraint for {0} which was not satisfied", Package, Name, A1, A2, A3, A4)
|
||||||
|
:- external(node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
not attr("external_conditions_hold", node(ID, Package), _),
|
||||||
|
imposed_constraint(EID, "external_conditions_hold", Package, _),
|
||||||
|
trigger_and_effect(Package, TID, EID),
|
||||||
|
condition_requirement(TID, Name, A1, A2, A3, A4),
|
||||||
|
not attr(Name, node(_, A1), A2, A3, A4).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% error message with causes for conflicts
|
||||||
|
error(0, Msg, startcauses, TriggerID, ID1, ConstraintID, ID2)
|
||||||
|
:- attr("node", node(ID, Package)),
|
||||||
|
pkg_fact(Package, conflict(TriggerID, ConstraintID, Msg)),
|
||||||
|
% node(ID1, TriggerPackage) is node(ID2, Package) in most, but not all, cases
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(TriggerID, node(ID1, TriggerPackage)),
|
||||||
|
condition_holds(ConstraintID, node(ID2, Package)),
|
||||||
|
unification_set(X, node(ID2, Package)),
|
||||||
|
unification_set(X, node(ID1, TriggerPackage)),
|
||||||
|
not external(node(ID, Package)), % ignore conflicts for externals
|
||||||
|
not attr("hash", node(ID, Package), _). % ignore conflicts for installed packages
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% variables to show
|
||||||
|
#show error/2.
|
||||||
|
#show error/3.
|
||||||
|
#show error/4.
|
||||||
|
#show error/5.
|
||||||
|
#show error/6.
|
||||||
|
#show error/7.
|
||||||
|
#show error/8.
|
||||||
|
#show error/9.
|
||||||
|
#show error/10.
|
||||||
|
#show error/11.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#show condition_cause/4.
|
||||||
|
#show condition_reason/2.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% Define all variables used to avoid warnings at runtime when the model doesn't happen to have one
|
||||||
|
#defined error/2.
|
||||||
|
#defined error/3.
|
||||||
|
#defined error/4.
|
||||||
|
#defined error/5.
|
||||||
|
#defined error/6.
|
||||||
|
#defined attr/2.
|
||||||
|
#defined attr/3.
|
||||||
|
#defined attr/4.
|
||||||
|
#defined attr/5.
|
||||||
|
#defined pkg_fact/2.
|
||||||
|
#defined imposed_constraint/3.
|
||||||
|
#defined imposed_constraint/4.
|
||||||
|
#defined imposed_constraint/5.
|
||||||
|
#defined imposed_constraint/6.
|
||||||
|
#defined condition_requirement/3.
|
||||||
|
#defined condition_requirement/4.
|
||||||
|
#defined condition_requirement/5.
|
||||||
|
#defined condition_requirement/6.
|
||||||
|
#defined condition_holds/2.
|
||||||
|
#defined unification_set/2.
|
||||||
|
#defined external/1.
|
||||||
|
#defined trigger_and_effect/3.
|
||||||
|
#defined build/1.
|
||||||
|
#defined node_has_variant/2.
|
||||||
|
#defined provider/2.
|
||||||
|
#defined external_version/3.
|
|
@ -11,10 +11,6 @@
|
||||||
%-----------------
|
%-----------------
|
||||||
% Domain heuristic
|
% Domain heuristic
|
||||||
%-----------------
|
%-----------------
|
||||||
#heuristic attr("hash", node(0, Package), Hash) : literal(_, "root", Package). [45, init]
|
|
||||||
#heuristic attr("root", node(0, Package)) : literal(_, "root", Package). [45, true]
|
|
||||||
#heuristic attr("node", node(0, Package)) : literal(_, "root", Package). [45, true]
|
|
||||||
#heuristic attr("node", node(0, Package)) : literal(_, "node", Package). [45, true]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Root node
|
% Root node
|
||||||
#heuristic attr("version", node(0, Package), Version) : pkg_fact(Package, version_declared(Version, 0)), attr("root", node(0, Package)). [35, true]
|
#heuristic attr("version", node(0, Package), Version) : pkg_fact(Package, version_declared(Version, 0)), attr("root", node(0, Package)). [35, true]
|
||||||
|
@ -26,4 +22,3 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Providers
|
% Providers
|
||||||
#heuristic attr("node", node(0, Package)) : default_provider_preference(Virtual, Package, 0), possible_in_link_run(Package). [30, true]
|
#heuristic attr("node", node(0, Package)) : default_provider_preference(Virtual, Package, 0), possible_in_link_run(Package). [30, true]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
68
lib/spack/spack/test/concretize_errors.py
Normal file
68
lib/spack/spack/test/concretize_errors.py
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||||
|
# Copyright 2013-2023 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC and other
|
||||||
|
# Spack Project Developers. See the top-level COPYRIGHT file for details.
|
||||||
|
#
|
||||||
|
# SPDX-License-Identifier: (Apache-2.0 OR MIT)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
import pytest
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
import spack.solver.asp
|
||||||
|
import spack.spec
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
pytestmark = [
|
||||||
|
pytest.mark.not_on_windows("Windows uses old concretizer"),
|
||||||
|
pytest.mark.only_clingo("Original concretizer does not support configuration requirements"),
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
version_error_messages = [
|
||||||
|
"Cannot satisfy 'fftw@:1.0' and 'fftw@1.1:",
|
||||||
|
" required because quantum-espresso depends on fftw@:1.0",
|
||||||
|
" required because quantum-espresso ^fftw@1.1: requested from CLI",
|
||||||
|
" required because quantum-espresso ^fftw@1.1: requested from CLI",
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
external_error_messages = [
|
||||||
|
(
|
||||||
|
"Attempted to build package quantum-espresso which is not buildable and does not have"
|
||||||
|
" a satisfying external"
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
(
|
||||||
|
" 'quantum-espresso~veritas' is an external constraint for quantum-espresso"
|
||||||
|
" which was not satisfied"
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
" 'quantum-espresso+veritas' required",
|
||||||
|
" required because quantum-espresso+veritas requested from CLI",
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
variant_error_messages = [
|
||||||
|
"'fftw' required multiple values for single-valued variant 'mpi'",
|
||||||
|
" Requested '~mpi' and '+mpi'",
|
||||||
|
" required because quantum-espresso depends on fftw+mpi when +invino",
|
||||||
|
" required because quantum-espresso+invino ^fftw~mpi requested from CLI",
|
||||||
|
" required because quantum-espresso+invino ^fftw~mpi requested from CLI",
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
external_config = {
|
||||||
|
"packages:quantum-espresso": {
|
||||||
|
"buildable": False,
|
||||||
|
"externals": [{"spec": "quantum-espresso@1.0~veritas", "prefix": "/path/to/qe"}],
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
|
||||||
|
"error_messages,config_set,spec",
|
||||||
|
[
|
||||||
|
(version_error_messages, {}, "quantum-espresso^fftw@1.1:"),
|
||||||
|
(external_error_messages, external_config, "quantum-espresso+veritas"),
|
||||||
|
(variant_error_messages, {}, "quantum-espresso+invino^fftw~mpi"),
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
def test_error_messages(error_messages, config_set, spec, mock_packages, mutable_config):
|
||||||
|
for path, conf in config_set.items():
|
||||||
|
spack.config.set(path, conf)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
with pytest.raises(spack.solver.asp.UnsatisfiableSpecError) as e:
|
||||||
|
_ = spack.spec.Spec(spec).concretized()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
for em in error_messages:
|
||||||
|
assert em in str(e.value)
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue