ASP-based solver: don't error for type mismatch on preferences (#41138)

This commit discards type mismatches or failures to validate a package preference during concretization. The values discarded are logged as debug level messages. It also adds a config audit to help users spot misconfigurations in packages.yaml preferences.
This commit is contained in:
Massimiliano Culpo 2023-11-23 11:30:39 +01:00 committed by Harmen Stoppels
parent f39a1e5fc8
commit 4f7cce68b8
3 changed files with 65 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -286,6 +286,54 @@ def make_error(attribute_name, config_data, summary):
return errors
@config_packages
def _avoid_mismatched_variants(error_cls):
"""Warns if variant preferences have mismatched types or names."""
errors = []
packages_yaml = spack.config.CONFIG.get_config("packages")
def make_error(config_data, summary):
s = io.StringIO()
s.write("Occurring in the following file:\n")
syaml.dump_config(config_data, stream=s, blame=True)
return error_cls(summary=summary, details=[s.getvalue()])
for pkg_name in packages_yaml:
# 'all:' must be more forgiving, since it is setting defaults for everything
if pkg_name == "all" or "variants" not in packages_yaml[pkg_name]:
continue
preferences = packages_yaml[pkg_name]["variants"]
if not isinstance(preferences, list):
preferences = [preferences]
for variants in preferences:
current_spec = spack.spec.Spec(variants)
pkg_cls = spack.repo.PATH.get_pkg_class(pkg_name)
for variant in current_spec.variants.values():
# Variant does not exist at all
if variant.name not in pkg_cls.variants:
summary = (
f"Setting a preference for the '{pkg_name}' package to the "
f"non-existing variant '{variant.name}'"
)
errors.append(make_error(preferences, summary))
continue
# Variant cannot accept this value
s = spack.spec.Spec(pkg_name)
try:
s.update_variant_validate(variant.name, variant.value)
except Exception:
summary = (
f"Setting the variant '{variant.name}' of the '{pkg_name}' package "
f"to the invalid value '{str(variant)}'"
)
errors.append(make_error(preferences, summary))
return errors
#: Sanity checks on package directives
package_directives = AuditClass(
group="packages",

View file

@ -1828,7 +1828,13 @@ def preferred_variants(self, pkg_name):
# perform validation of the variant and values
spec = spack.spec.Spec(pkg_name)
spec.update_variant_validate(variant_name, values)
try:
spec.update_variant_validate(variant_name, values)
except (spack.variant.InvalidVariantValueError, KeyError, ValueError) as e:
tty.debug(
f"[SETUP]: rejected {str(variant)} as a preference for {pkg_name}: {str(e)}"
)
continue
for value in values:
self.variant_values_from_specs.add((pkg_name, variant.name, value))

View file

@ -504,3 +504,13 @@ def test_sticky_variant_accounts_for_packages_yaml(self):
with spack.config.override("packages:sticky-variant", {"variants": "+allow-gcc"}):
s = Spec("sticky-variant %gcc").concretized()
assert s.satisfies("%gcc") and s.satisfies("+allow-gcc")
@pytest.mark.regression("41134")
@pytest.mark.only_clingo("Not backporting the fix to the old concretizer")
def test_default_preference_variant_different_type_does_not_error(self):
"""Tests that a different type for an existing variant in the 'all:' section of
packages.yaml doesn't fail with an error.
"""
with spack.config.override("packages:all", {"variants": "+foo"}):
s = Spec("a").concretized()
assert s.satisfies("foo=bar")